Tests of the three current strategies for reducing tile size

This commit is contained in:
Eric Fischer
2016-10-24 15:33:14 -07:00
parent 7cb7fc4913
commit f32916c472
8 changed files with 46772 additions and 6 deletions
+2
View File
@@ -102,6 +102,8 @@ compensate for the larger marker, or \-Bf\fInumber\fP to allow at most \fInumber
\-b \fIpixels\fP or \-\-buffer=\fIpixels\fP: Buffer size where features are duplicated from adjacent tiles. Units are "screen pixels"\-\-1/256th of the tile width or height. (default 5)
.IP \(bu 2
\-s \fIprojection\fP or \-\-projection=\fIprojection\fP: Specify the projection of the input data. Currently supported are EPSG:4326 (WGS84, the default) and EPSG:3857 (Web Mercator).
.IP \(bu 2
\-k \fIbytes\fP or \-\-maximum\-tile\-bytes=\fIbytes\fP: Use the specified number of \fIbytes\fP as the maximum compressed tile size instead of 500K.
.RE
.PP
All internal math is done in terms of a 32\-bit tile coordinate system, so 1/(2 of the size of Earth,